Matching for Fellowship Interviews

Humans

Surgical fellowships have proliferated over the last 2 decades. Recent data suggest that the application process has become inefficient and costly, especially for candidates and programs in competitive surgical specialties.1 Although the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) accredits many programs, other organizations, such as the Foundation for Surgical Fellowships, the Society of Surgical Oncology, and the American Society of Transplantation, certify non-ACGME fellowships. Of 3354 graduating general surgery residents from 2009 to 2013 who responded to a survey by the American Board of Surgery, 74% (n = 2478) sought surgical specialty training.2 Candidates for surgical fellowships are matched to programs following the “deferred acceptance” matching algorithm similar to the one used by the National Resident Matching Program (NRMP).3 This algorithm assigns each candidate to a program such that if an applicant ranked another program over the one to which they were assigned, then that program must have ranked all their assigned trainee(s) over this candidate.

Articles You May Like

Overdiagnosis of Penicillin Allergy Leads to Costly, Inappropriate Treatment
Scientists Made A Mistake: The Oceans May Not Be Warming Faster After All
This insane device both harvests solar energy and sends excess heat into space
Empirical assessment of the impact of sample number and read depth on RNA-Seq analysis workflow performance
Why Don’t We Forget How to Ride a Bike?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *